Vol. 53, 2014
A predictive modeling approach to test distributional
uniformity of Uruguayan harvestmen (Arachnida: Opiliones)
Miguel
Simó1,2,3*†, José Carlos Guerrero3,4,
Leandro Giuliani1, Ismael Castellano1 and Luis E
Acosta5,6†
1Sección
Entomología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Iguá
4225, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay
2Laboratorio de Entomología, Museo Nacional de
Historia Natural Nacional, 25 de Mayo 582, Montevideo 11000, Uruguay
3Programa de Desarrollo de las Ciencias Básicas,
PEDECIBA, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
4Laboratorio de Desarrollo Sustentable y Gestión
Ambiental del Territorio, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la
República, Iguá 4225, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay
5Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal (IDEA),
CONICET-Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Vélez Sarsfield 299,
Córdoba 5000, Argentina
6Cátedra de Diversidad Animal I, Facultad de Ciencias
Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av.
Vélez Sarsfield 299, Córdoba 5000, Argentina
Abstract
Background: Harvestmen are a good
taxon for biogeographic studies due to their low vagility and their
dependence on environmental conditions which make most of them live in
humid and shaded habitats. Current knowledge of the geographical
distribution of Uruguayan opiliofauna suggests that no evident
zoogeographic areas are present, mainly because of the apparent
uniformity of the landscape of this country. Recent biogeographic
studies indicate that Uruguay represents a biogeographical crossroad
between three South American provinces, and the aim of this study is
focused on determining if this fact is reflected in the distribution of
the Uruguayan opiliofauna. To test this presumption, we used the
species distribution model methodology. Distribution data about four
harvestmen species from Uruguay and neighboring countries were
analyzed. We used the maximum entropy principle to perform a
distribution model for each species.
Results: We recognized Acanthopachylus aculeatus and Pachyloides thorellii
as two Pampasic representatives of the Uruguayan opiliofauna. The other
species studied, Discocyrtus prospicuus and Metalibitia paraguayensis, reflect Mesopotamian
and Paranaense influences in the Uruguayan territory. Isothermality was
the climatic variable with the best contribution in the models of the
four species, reflecting constrained latitudinal ranges.
Conclusions: Results of the present
study suggest that two roughly different opiliological areas for
Uruguay can be recognized, based on climatic variables.
Key words: Opiliofauna; Potential
distribution; Biogeographic patterns; South America; Neotropical.
*Correspondence: E-mail: simo@fcien.edu.uy †Equal
contributors.
|